🧘‍♀️ The 30 for 30 episode Julia Lowrie Henderson can’t shake

Presented by Cozy Critters

🎯 Is This Mission-Critical?

Every podcaster wrestles with decisions: Should I redesign the cover art? Buy a new mic? Redo that one sentence in the script for the fifth time, even though it’s already great?

The danger isn’t the decision itself, it’s treating everything like it’s life or death.

Ask yourself:

• Is this mission-critical?

• Does it move the story forward?

• Does it help the listener care?

The truth is, most of what we agonize over isn’t imperative at all. Mission-critical is clarity, connection, and consistency. Everything else is just a distraction.

🎙️ Signal Flow: Julia Lowrie Henderson

Industry game changers and valiant minds share their wisdom, adversities, and paths to innovation.

Julia Lowrie Henderson is a graduate of the Salt Institute for Documentary Studies, and holds a BFA from Boston University. She has been a Senior Producer of Limited Series at Wondery since 2021, where she's led series like Fed Up, Frozen Head, Scam Factory, and Exposed: Cover-Up at Columbia University. Before that, she was the Senior Editorial Producer for ESPN's 30 for 30 Podcasts, producing series like King of Crenshaw, Heavy Medals, The Sterling Affairs, and Bikram.

Editor’s note: The following interview has been edited for flow and clarity.

Seeing ESPN’s 30 for 30 named to Time’s Top 100 Podcasts was incredibly special. That feed has had so many lives: anthology seasons, serialized stories, a pandemic lull, periods of dormancy, periods of reinvention. You wonder sometimes if it still resonates, if it still matters. To know that it does, and to see it finding second, third, fourth winds, was deeply gratifying.

The origin story of 30 for 30 Podcasts still makes me smile. The truth is, when we started back in 2016, we were just sitting in a room trying to figure out which stories to greenlight. 

I’d been recruited just as ESPN was deciding to jump into audio. Our offices shared a floor with FiveThirtyEight, and Jody Avirgan seized the moment, got a budget, and hired a small team of producers (Andrew Mambo, Rio Eveleth, and me) and a couple of PAs (to that team we later added Mitra Kaboli, Meradith Hoddinott, and Gus Navarro). But at the time, that was it: four producers (including Jody), a couple of PAs, and the wide-open question of what this thing would be. Out of that came a body of work I’ll always be proud of.

Looking back, I’m proud of the ways we managed to be not just with the times but sometimes a step ahead. We changed how you could tell sports stories in podcasting, and in that sense, we honored the 30 for 30 brand, which had already done that in film.

At this point, I mostly live in the role of senior producer of limited series, shaping and editing, but I’ll always have a soft spot for the 30 for 30 Bikram story. That project asked me to wear every hat at once, and because of that, it left the deepest mark.

I had practiced Bikram yoga for years, so the reporting was personally shattering. The hardest truth was realizing how much of his power came from lies, the undeniable fact that he didn’t invent this yoga, that his entire lineage was fabricated. Everything else, the abuse, the manipulation, the harm, flowed from that false foundation. Discovering it, speaking with sources in India, learning from those who knew the real history…that was the most damning and upsetting part of the process.

Structuring the Bikram episodes was like assembling a massive puzzle. We had whiteboards covered with buckets of characters, themes, and eras. Fifty years of a yoga empire boiled down into five episodes meant building multiple maps (by time, by theme, by character) and then weaving them together into a single journey.

It was chaos. Until suddenly it wasn’t. Until the through line revealed itself. Those are the moments I live for as a producer.

Working with such heavy material is always a balancing act. With Bikram, the darkness was constant, but there was also his persona, fast-paced, full of jokes, Hollywood flash. That surface-level charisma became a natural antidote in the storytelling, a way to keep listeners engaged without diminishing the harm underneath.

The same was true later with Exposed: Cover-Up at Columbia University. In stories about abuse, you’re always aware of how much is too much for a listener to bear, and how much you need to leave intact to honor survivors’ voices.

For me, the risk is always worth it if it means letting someone tell their trauma in their own words, without over-explaining, without turning it into something exploitative.

(continued below)

……………………..

🎉 Celebrating 2 million downloads in its first year!

Families everywhere are cozying up with Cozy Critters! In just one year, the award-winning bedtime podcast has been played over 2 million times around the world. Gentle stories, calming sounds, and lovable characters help kids wind down while learning about animals. One listen and you’ll see why it’s become a global favorite.

👉 Make tonight a Cozy Critters night

……………………..

(continued from above)

Over the years, I’ve realized that my favorite part of the process is the story itself. I’m a nerd about structure, a nerd about character, a nerd about the ways those things fit together. At 30 for 30, I saw firsthand what happens when you fight for a project you believe in.

There were stories on the table, like Girl v. Horse, that I knew needed to be made. Even after I left, listening back and hearing how powerful it was gave me this unexpected sense of pride. I had no involvement in the final product, but I knew I’d helped create the conditions for it to exist. That felt just as satisfying as putting my own voice on tape.

If there’s a common thread in my work, it’s risk. Sometimes it’s structural, letting abrasive characters in the “Yankees Suck” episode sound exactly as they are, warts and all. Sometimes it’s emotional, leaving survivor accounts as raw and honest as they come. Those choices feel vulnerable, but they pay off. They make the story truer.

What I love most about 30 for 30 is that it has survived so many changes of hands. That tells me it isn’t owned by any one person, the mission owns it. The brand itself is the thing. In a moment when so many shows and production companies are folding, that longevity feels rare. It’s a testament both to the people who’ve poured themselves into it and to the ability to take ego out of the equation so the story is always the focus.

I only have so many ways of telling a story from my perspective. What excites me is stepping back and helping a project figure out what it wants to be, letting it unfold on its own terms.

For me, that’s what it comes down to. I don’t want to make stories that sound like me. I want to help stories sound like themselves. That’s where the joy is.

🎧 Podcast of the Week: No Such Thing as a Fish

If you love facts that are as funny as they are surprising, this one’s a gem. Each week, the researchers behind the hit TV show QI share their favorite bizarre discoveries (from ancient oddities to modern marvels) with plenty of wit and banter. It’s smart, silly, and guaranteed to leave you with trivia worth dropping at your next dinner party.

🥾 Further Exploration: A Wired Chat on the Creative Costs of AI

In this episode of Uncanny Valley, the hosts face listener anxieties head-on, asking where AI is helping and hurting creative work, from Hollywood dubbing to content safety. It’s a sharp, grounded look at the tension between human and digital creativity…with no easy answers.

ICYMI:

💀 This true crime podcast puts you to sleep

🏆 A 2x World Cup champ just changed the podcast playbook

🎙️ Why filmmaker Rhym Guissé stepped behind a podcast mic

💡 The Quiet Spark

A weekly question to ignite fresh thinking, stir self-reflection, and fuel your creative process behind the mic.

If your podcast disappeared tomorrow, what would your listeners miss most?